Journalist is this country are now trained to be part of advocacy journalism. That is to slant the story for some greater purpose. This means that stories are judged through this lens. Stories that support there agenda are emphasized. And others downplayed or ignored. Thus because the most recent shooting was by some racist nut they give it tremendous play. Stories like when an American citizen turned radical Muslim shoots two American soldiers
gets almost no play. Someone else with a clear mental health issue kills an abortion doctor, major play. The story about his criminal prosecution for numerous felonies is derailed by former Kansas Governor Selbius, nothing. And so it goes.
<!-- begin pfv --><!-- writer and photo option -->
<!-- end option --><!-- leadin graphic -->
<!-- end leadin graphic -->
<!-- standing head -->
<!-- end standing head --><!-- head -->Darwin-loving museum shooter hates Bible, Christians
<!-- end head --><!-- deck -->Suspect in death of security guard defies easy stereotyping
<!-- end deck -->
Posted: June 11, 2009
11:45 pm Eastern
By Bob Unruh
<!-- copyright -->© 2009 WorldNetDaily <!-- end copyright -->
<!-- begin bodytext -->
James von Brunn |
James von Brunn, the man who allegedly shot and killed a guard at the Holocaust Memorial Museum in Washington, D.C., was a Darwin-lover who hated the Bible and Christians, and defies media efforts to classify him as a stereotypical "right-winger," according to reports.
The Moonbattery blog revealed von Brunn advocated the socialist policies espoused by Adolf Hitler and used Darwinian theory to support his anti-Semitism.
to read more:
http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=100882